Press, research, and dispatches from the making of the film.
Mainstream coverage of Pembient, the rhino horn trade, and the field.

BuzzFeed’s November 2020 follow‑up covers the 160‑page independent review WWF commissioned after being accused of funding abusive rangers. Led by former UN rights chief Navi Pillay, the panel corroborated patterns of torture, rape, and killings in WWF‑backed parks in Nepal, Cameroon, the Republic of Congo, and the DRC.

BuzzFeed’s 2019 investigation traced roughly $157 million in US government grants to WWF, including around $10 million for armed guards and enforcement. The story triggered a review of $125 million in conservation grants and was entered into the House Natural Resources Committee record.

This Upworthy piece, dated 2019, repackages the "kill some bad guys and do some good" framing that helped sink Vetpaw's 2015 Tanzania deployment. It is part of a pattern: viral hero stories about US veterans "hunting poachers" in Africa that keep circulating online long after the projects have collapsed.

A yearlong investigation across six countries documented how WWF helped fund, equip and politically shield anti‑poaching units that villagers accused of torture, sexual assault and murder. It exposed weapons deals, informant networks and village raids that sat behind the charity’s panda logo.

The Star Tribune covers a Traffic analysis showing that traffickers are increasingly running clandestine horn workshops in South Africa, turning whole horns into beads, bracelets, and powder before shipping to Asia. The shift makes detection harder and signals both a move toward luxury products and a workaround for tighter border enforcement.

The BBC’s 2017 piece follows Traffic’s warning that smugglers are turning rhino horn into beads, bangles and powder to evade airport checks, as demand shifts from supposed medicine to luxury status items in China and Vietnam.

In 2019 The Economist described how China is rebuilding Traditional Chinese Medicine as a state project: subsidised hospitals, export campaigns, political theatre. It also traced the collateral damage, from endangered wildlife to the politics that keep TCM above scientific scrutiny.

By August 2017, poaching gangs had killed 166 rhinos in KwaZulu‑Natal, already surpassing the previous year’s total and setting a record killing rate of one rhino every 32 hours in the province that once pulled the species back from extinction.

National Geographic frames the auction as a test case in private rhino ranching, legal markets, and the question of whether farmed horn can compete with black‑market supply. Critics worry about leakage, Hume argues legal supply will drive down prices, and the government promises tracking systems will keep horn from crossing borders.

Al Jazeera’s 2017 piece tracks how breeder John Hume opened a three-day online rhino horn sale in South Africa, run through Vans Auctioneers and restricted to permit holders, after a court ruling lifted the domestic trade ban. It captures the mechanics and politics of the first legal auction of its kind.

An AFP dispatch carried by Guardian Nigeria reports that South Africa’s environment ministry has cleared breeder John Hume’s online rhino horn auction to proceed under strict permit rules. It quotes Hume’s lawyer on the court battle and Edna Molewa on the government’s conditions, framing the sale as a regional conservation story, not just a domestic legal spat.

In August 2017 a South African court instructed the government to give breeder John Hume the permit he needed to auction about 500 kilograms of rhino horn domestically. The ruling sits at the hinge between the lifted moratorium, the first online auction, and fears that “legal” horn would leak into Asian markets.

In August 2017, Edna Molewa announced strict conditions for any rhino horn auction held within South Africa, including buyer permits, microchipping, and proof that horn would remain in the country. Her statement shows how the state tried to contain a court‑ordered reopening of domestic trade.

Karin Brulliard reports on research that compared Chinese and English‑language coverage of rhino horn demand. Western outlets stressed traditional medicine 84 percent of the time; Chinese outlets focused on horn as art and investment 79 percent of the time. The gap matters for how conservation campaigns are designed and where they aim.

Conservation groups WildAid and the Center for Biological Diversity urged the Obama administration to ban “synthetic” rhino horn, warning that lab‑made, genetically engineered horn sold into China and Vietnam could fuel demand, enable laundering of real horn, and undermine hard‑won progress in reducing consumption.

National Geographic exclusive on the formal petition filed by the Center for Biological Diversity and WildAid asking the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to ban the trade in bioengineered rhino horn.

In November 2015, the Smithsonian gave Pembient its most prestigious platform of the year, running Markus's market-flooding strategy under the headline "Rhinoplasty." Unlike the conservation press, it didn't treat synthetic horn as a controversy. It put it alongside drones and horn-poisoning as a real option.

Tom A. Peter's Al Jazeera America piece traces the full arc of Vetpaw's Tanzania deployment: a year of preparation, weeks of productive ranger training, a viral social‑media storm around Kinessa Johnson's "kill some bad guys" quote, and a government expulsion that shut the project down before it could prove itself.

Fast Company breaks the news of Pembient's first commercial partnership: a rhino horn beer to be released in Beijing, leveraging horn's traditional reputation as a hangover remedy.

This 2015 piece traces how Vetpaw, a small US veterans organization training anti‑poaching rangers in Tanzania, was told to leave the country after comments about “killing bad guys” and heavily armed promo images sparked backlash and a government response.

The earliest of the 2015 cluster, framed Pembient through IndieBio and the biotech-on-a-budget moment. Published two days before New Scientist and a month before The Guardian, it gave Pembient its first major platform from the tech press: optimistic, solution-focused, with no conservation framing.

Days after Pembient's prototype announcement, New Scientist became the first major science outlet to frame synthetic rhino horn as a threat, not a breakthrough. The piece introduced TRAFFIC's Crawford Allan and Save Vietnam's Wildlife founder Nguyen Van Thai, who became the template voices of institutional opposition.
Juliette Marquis speaks with Documentary Magazine about the decade-long journey behind Horn Maker.
After ten years and four continents, the film reaches its final cut ahead of the 2026 festival run.

The Guardian profiles Pembient and its founder Matthew Markus in one of the earliest pieces of press coverage of the bio-identical horn project. Horn Maker would follow the story from here for nearly a decade.